Calin Manda vs Teodor-Dacian Craciun Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W L W L L L
Form
L L W L W L W L L WHead To Head: Manda 1 - 1 Craciun
They have played 4 sets in total, with Manda winning 2 and Craciun winning 2. The last match between Manda and Craciun was at the Romania F10, 20-07-2015, Second, Clay with Calin Manda getting the victory 6-4 7-6(1).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Calin Manda | 1 |
| Teodor-Dacian Craciun | 1 |
Romania F10(20-07-2015)
6
4
7
6
| Manda | Stats | Craciun |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 890 | Ranking | 817 |
| 607 | Highest Rank | 218 |
| 27 | Age | 44 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 12 |
| 54% (216-183) | Career Total W/L | 61% (368-240) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $10,155 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sakkari VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dzumhur VS Arnaldi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(1) | |||||
| 6-4 7-5 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 22 | Games Won | 23 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Calin Manda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Stefan Adrian Andreescu
Player
Calin Manda
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bogdan Pavel
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Michel Hopp
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Calin Manda
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
8
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Sarp Agabigun
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
81)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
7
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Attila Boros
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Giotis
Player
Calin Manda
49%
(
41 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
8
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
0
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Corentin Denolly
52%
(
54 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 6-7(5) 10-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Michael Agwi
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
11
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Teodor-Dacian Craciun Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-2 10-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 2-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(5) 5-7 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-2 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (216/183) | Win/Loss | 61% (368/240) |
| 56% (491/387) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (815/560) |
| 52% (4145/3752) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (6820/5767) |
| 48% (20/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (52/38) |
| 55% (195/158) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (307/193) |
| 25% (1/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (9/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 683 | Aces Total | 145 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.04 |
| 697 | Total Double Faults | 262 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 435.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 516.7 |
| 62% (9563/15440) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3550/5910) |
| 65% (6211/9563) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (2242/3550) |
| 50% (2964/5877) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1120/2360) |
| 45% (646/1445) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (291/666) |
| 39% (5823/14851) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2495/5884) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 41% (9/13) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (3/5) | Challenger W/L | 52% (65/61) |
| 54% (213/178) | Futures W/L | 64% (293/164) |
| 56% (213/379) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (364/589) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 29% (2/7) |
| 54% (36/67) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (70/134) |
| 39% (37/96) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (90/165) |
| 86% (231/199) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (362/324) |
| 13% (231/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (362/36) |
| 11% (168/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (246/45) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
